VAT
on new buildings aims at tax dodgers, speculators
Transfer taxation modified
in buyers favor; inheritors also stand to gain
DEMETRIS NELLAS
Economy and Finance Minister Giorgos
Alogoskoufis yesterday unveiled the draft bill imposing
a 19 percent value-added tax (VAT) on new buildings
after January 1, 2006.
First-time house buyers will be exempt from the tax.
The tax is going to be paid by property owners to
construction firms which, in turn, will pay the VAT
to the state. Transfers of properties acquired after
January 1, 2006 will be subject to a graduated capital
gains tax, whose rate depends on the number of years
the seller owned the property before selling.
Thus, the tax rate is 20 percent for owners selling
a property after ownership of up to five years; 15
percent if the ownership period was from five to 15
years; 5 percent if it was from 15 to 25 years; and
0 percent if the seller owned the property for over
25 years. Property buyers, who until now paid up to
11 percent of the property’s value as transfer
tax, will henceforth pay a 1 percent tax called a
transaction fee. Other provisions in the same bill
increase the tax-free portion of inheritances or parental
transfers of property from 20,000 euros to 80,000
euros and extend the payment time for inheritance
taxes from 24 monthly installments to 24 bimonthly
ones. The government presented the new bill as a step
toward fighting tax evasion and speculation. At the
same time it introduces VAT it will also raise the
so-called ‘objective values’ of properties
by up to 50 percent. These values, which differ according
to location, are the ones on which property taxation
is based. The VAT will be based on those values as
well. While the government hopes the VAT, payable
to the state through the construction firms, will
help reduce the gap between the objective and the
actual market values, this is far from certain. In
the past, every time objective values rose, so did
market values. The latter rose even when objective
values stayed steady, as they have done since 2001.
While the reported disparity between the two used
to be between 30 and 50 percent, lately there have
been reported instances of properties being sold at
market prices up to 10 times their ‘objective’
value. Curiously, the last two times the objective
values were upwardly adjusted, in 1998 and 2001, there
had been a big increase in tax revenue in the year
before that: In 1997, property tax revenues jumped
57 percent from the previous year, and in 2000, they
rose 37 percent. Perhaps this is what the government
intends to do; that is, raise revenue for 2005, ahead
of the new measure. If that is so, this tax reform
may be seen more like a desperate ploy to fill state
coffers this year, when tax revenue targets have proved
to be too ambitious.
Given until 2006 by the European Union to bring the
budget deficit below 3 percent of Greece’s GDP,
the government had planned for a deficit of around
3.5 percent this year, which would make the task relatively
easy. If, however, as the present state of finances
indicates, the deficit stays at around 5 percent of
GDP, then the pressure for really deep, and unpopular,
spending cuts will be immense.